How does homosexuality make one literate in Norway by contrast to illiteracy?

Re: Norway - gays can marry
by Patrick
06/12/2008, 9:58 PM

Taking a page out of JGC's book (some wry humor there), some questions are in order:

1. How can you correlate the positive condition of the state with gay marriage when like conditions concerning other states don't necessarily and conversely correlate in the negative (e.g. as for the negative, many of those states that accept gay marriage are welfare states and tend towards a socialistic society where prices are outrageous to pay for everything)?

2. How does "homosexual" = "heterosexual" when the two are basically antitheses as to meaning? Why isn't this like equating "bachelor" with "married" or say "dog" with "cat"?

3. What does their proposed law make one equal to? Social status? Legal status? Other status?

4. What if two heterosexuals marry under the pretense of gay marriage (e.g. of the same sex but more like college roomies to get perks)? What of equality then?

5. If marriage is to reproductive type intercourse (e.g. reduced to it's carnal expression), but gay's are to marriage, how is equality served when gays cannot express the basic intercourse style as related to marriage?

6. Related to #5, if marriage is not about sex then, it basically allows the two college roomies to marry in #4. If not, why not? And...if you deny marriage to the two heterosexual college roomies who marry their same sex, then is equality served? Why or why not?

7. How does #6 effect social status? Legal status? Other status?

8. How does homosexuality make one literate in Norway by contrast to illiteracy, as you correlate to gay marriage? Does this truly have anything to do with education? Does your level of learned education correlate to how much you've been indoctrinated perhaps?

9. What does annual income per se have to do with gay marriage? Because that country is richer, they can afford the various lawyers and special interests to get the gay marriage proposes passed in their legislature?

10. How do you (or rather the author I guess) know that gay marriage will strengthen marriage? Why won't it weaken it? Is this actually a basic reassurance technique to get your "lollipop" treat (i.e. to get your perk or way)?

11. What does the number of those participating in marriage have to do with the firm foundation of marriage? Why is this the only way to measure marriage? Any other litmus test available? Will it strengthen the various financial components of marriage? And how is such strengthened in the welfare states where gay marriage was legalized and all the prices are jacked up to skyrocketed bills, fees, and prices? If it's not strengthened, is it weakened because marriage and raising a family is SO much more expensive!? And other like questions can be asked such as whether marriage can also be correlated with how easy it is to pass gay marriage legislature in these types of countries/states and so what level or order and/or chaos are in these countries? In other words, how easy can one make a law or bribe officials to make the laws you want?

12. Why do some many people seem conditioned to see gay marriage in a positive light? What's so good about the normal structure of gay culture where the norm is a single monogamous relationship but where sexual partners outside that relationship is the basic understanding? Plus the normal stresses of biological families (and conversely the rewards) isn't the same with the stresses of homosexual relationships, so again how are the two types the same and therefore equal? I mean, what is so inheritly damned good about homosexual relationships, especially when it's so difficult to foster new ones by having biological ties between two parents and their offspring? And where homosexual ties aren't as easy to come by naturally, why does the conditioned person see homosexual ties as a superior societal mesh? What are the ties that weave and bind society? I suppose I could continue but that'll get the 'ol cogs rolling for now instead of thinking in the conditioned manner so many of you are accustomed too. Are you guys the type of people where when you say something often enough, you start to believe it?